This isn't. It's the method I use to bring AI into HR teams safely: built from tools I shipped and piloted with real stakeholders, not from theory.
by Bianca Rohr — HR Data & AI Analyst, AI Solutions Builder
Start from the HR problems AI can actually solve, and be honest about the ones it can't. Document fraud in onboarding was one worth solving.
hr-idv-fraud-detectionProduction-tested prompt patterns for real HR workflows, with guardrails written into the prompt rather than hoped for.
hr-ai-prompt-libraryHow AI actually reaches a workflow: the integration layer, the rollout, the training, and the governance that earns sign-off.
hris-mcp-connectorDecision tools that keep a human in the loop: scoring rubrics, bias guardrails, and verify-don't-accuse design.
ai-resume-screenerGovernance-first. Every system I build ships with human-in-the-loop design, bias guardrails, and documentation a DPO can read cold and sign off on. The restraint is the feature, not a constraint on it.
Adoption-focused. A tool nobody uses solves nothing. I build the training and change management that get a team actually working differently, not just a clever script that sits unused.
Production over portfolio. The work behind this framework ran on real HR workflows with real stakeholders, with the messy edges that only show up once something is live.
Each pillar above points to something real. Here they all are.
I'm open to AI engineering and HR AI roles. The clearest picture of how I work is the code itself. Start there.
View my work on GitHub →